Asrock 970A-G/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970A-G/3.1  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display7680 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '21 at 19:23
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 62.4
2-Core 135
56% 92.4 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 417
40% 332 Pts
64-Core 420
26% 420 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 138
Parallax 130
105% 132 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 135
Splatting 116
100% 122 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
552GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 624 731 849 859 831 836 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 1,040
Write 1,004
Mixed 1,058
SusWrite 788
219% 973 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 44.2
162% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 368
DQ Mixed 260
206% 281 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 152%
Great: 372%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
228GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 270 271 271 271 271 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 338
Write 292
Mixed 316
SusWrite 274
69% 305 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 36.3
118% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 72.3
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 87.4
87% 134 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 118%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$89
931GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 336 388 353 381 350 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 346
Write 309
Mixed 427
SusWrite 351
81% 358 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 38.9
125% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 43.2
74% 145 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G Corsair CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 KHX1866C10D3/8G Corsair CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
44.5% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 15.2
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 12.2
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970A-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 350 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970A-G/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $269
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback