Lenovo F0C3001RUK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive86.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo F0C3001RUK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO AntWerp
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160318
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '21 at 14:01
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
56% Above average
Memory 71.3
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 176
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 251
32% 243 Pts
64-Core 252
16% 252 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 56%
Great: 57%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKP1A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 161 128 129 128 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 438
Write 372
Mixed 335
SusWrite 175
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 81.8
4K Mixed 38.1
146% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 208
184% 274 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FRS 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.5% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 12.3
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 13.2
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 98.4
41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback