Asus G74Sx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus G74Sx  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G74Sx
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110923
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '21 at 04:04
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
64% Good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 145
60% 100 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 347
38% 300 Pts
64-Core 345
21% 345 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 64%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M
Asus(1043 204A) 3GB
CLim: 775 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.73
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
7.78% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 12.4
Parallax 8.5
8% 10 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 9.9
Splatting 9.3
8% 10.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.78%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 321 307 299 308 310 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
60% Good
Read 317
Write 286
Mixed 234
SusWrite 316
65% 288 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 21.7
84% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 25.8
DQ Write 75.7
DQ Mixed 25.6
27% 42.4 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 60%
Great: 128%
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB
306GB free
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 336 315 307 312 314 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 306
Write 286
Mixed 131
SusWrite 325
59% 262 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 24.4
81% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 24.1
DQ Write 79.9
DQ Mixed 37.2
33% 47.1 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTS1G64HZ-1G6E1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
54.5% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 17.7
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G74Sx Builds (Compare 482 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G74Sx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback