Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	4.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Q536FD
Memory	7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190531
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Oct 11 '21 at 15:49
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%
CPU Throttled	90%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8565U 81,207 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Memory 74.6 1-Core 113 2-Core 278 82% 155 Pts	4-Core 478 8-Core 655 72% 567 Pts	64-Core 630 39% 630 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1481) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7372 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	4.79% Terrible	Lighting 5 Reflection 36.4 Parallax 7 4% 16.1 fps	MRender 7.5 Gravity 5.6 Splatting 9 6% 7.37 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.79% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 794GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 858 456 463 269 601 448 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 835GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 672 745 712 702 686 679 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	209% Outstanding	Read 725 Write 715 Mixed 658 SusWrite 699 158% 699 MB/s	4K Read 65.5 4K Write 158 4K Mixed 89.9 298% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 1142 DQ Write 878 DQ Mixed 978 740% 999 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 209% Great: 410%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K44BM0-CRC 2x8GB 6,645 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	MC Read 30.3 MC Write 30.8 MC Mixed 22.2 79% 27.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 28.6 SC Mixed 23.2 66% 23.1 GB/s	Latency 91.2 44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD

CPU
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	131x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	86x
GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 21%, 1,537 samples	45x

SSD
SD9SN8W256G1102 256GBSandiskBench 69%, 3,311 samples	81x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	17x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	5x

RAM
M471A1K44BM0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 6,645 samples	131x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16