HP xw8600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP xw8600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A98h
Memory18.8 GB free of 24.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 11 '21 at 13:58
Run Duration315 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5420
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
44.7% Average
Memory 58.5
1-Core 44.6
2-Core 86.7
40% 63.3 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 302
29% 235 Pts
64-Core 305
20% 305 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$110
Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 20.1
Reflection 16.9
Parallax 19.1
16% 18.7 fps
MRender 23
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 0.2
18% 15 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 20%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X232
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 28 27 27 26 27 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.3% Average
Read 229
Write 151
Mixed 86.4
SusWrite 30.1
27% 124 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 20.5
82% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 98.4
DQ Mixed 106
89% 132 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 89%
Maxtor STM3160215AS 160GB
51GB free
Firmware: 4.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 55 54 56 56 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 51.5
Write 11.4
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 55.5
27% 36.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 42%
Seagate ST3500630NS 500GB-$37
234GB free
Firmware: 3.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 26 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 52.5
Write 27.7
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 27.1
26% 34.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
103% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 43%
WD Elements 1TB
233GB free, PID 10a8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 19 19 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 21.5
Write 19.2
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 19.4
27% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 57GB
null MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 6
15% 5.33 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.23 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 25: 2R 3G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
25% 11% 97 71 5 60 23" 1920 1080 DEL4099 DELL P2314H
History: Score 21: 4R 0G 1B | Score 28: 3R 3G 4B | Score 25: 2R 3G 6B
Typical xw8600 Workstation Builds (Compare 434 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw8600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 24% - Poor Total price: $26
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $300Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i5-11400F $195Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $67SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback