PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 99.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Gigabyte Default string |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20160829 |
Uptime | 21.9 Days |
Run Date | Aug 18 '17 at 13:34 |
Run Duration | 135 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
93.4%
Outstanding
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Nvidia(10DE 0995) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5
|
17.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
99.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
32.6%
Below average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
|
122%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6800KIntel $78Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 138x |
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples | 78x |
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 45x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 53x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 48x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 26x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $598 |