Gigabyte GA-Z270-HD3P-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemGigabyte Z270-HD3P
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270-HD3P-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateOct 10 '21 at 10:06
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 77%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$379
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 96
1-Core 138
2-Core 247
93% 160 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 648
70% 542 Pts
64-Core 622
42% 622 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$290
Gigabyte(1458 3718) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.3% Above average
Lighting 70.9
Reflection 76
Parallax 69.7
57% 72.2 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 71.4
Splatting 66.6
57% 68.7 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 62%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$88
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 490 114 103 98 98 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 1,288
Write 690
Mixed 405
SusWrite 167
140% 638 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 31
125% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,017
DQ Write 777
DQ Mixed 888
667% 894 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 140%
Great: 232%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$90
215GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 274 280 281 278 307 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 408
Write 285
Mixed 314
SusWrite 300
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 27.8
93% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 237
212% 321 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 116%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$91
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 151 167 163 166 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 208
Write 207
Mixed 84.5
SusWrite 163
121% 166 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
LEXAR JD FIREFLY 2GB
0GB free, PID a701
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.9 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
4.81% Terrible
Read 17.5
Write 5
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 5
9% 8 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.81%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$74
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 26.5
95% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 39.8
SC Mixed 27.1
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 53.9
74% 53.9 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 40: 7R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
40% 14% 71 349 289 60 27.2" 2560 1440 GSM5B09 LG Ultra HD
History: Score 10: 2R 0G 0B | Score 40: 7R 1G 2B
Typical GA-Z270-HD3P-CF Builds (Compare 1,725 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270-HD3P-CF - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $963
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $300Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $220Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $300Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback