Biostar A10N-9830E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics37.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar A10N-9830E  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display7680 x 4320 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191230
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 09 '21 at 18:31
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9830P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
44.4% Average
Memory 55.9
1-Core 69.7
2-Core 94.9
45% 73.5 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 190
26% 191 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.7% Below average
Lighting 49.4
Reflection 48.7
Parallax 42
40% 46.7 fps
MRender 36
Gravity 44.6
Splatting 39.6
33% 40.1 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$40
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0614B0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 161 315 172 294 145 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 1,221
Write 880
Mixed 691
SusWrite 248
169% 760 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 17.7
106% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 398
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 335
225% 279 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 106%
Great: 228%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
32GB free
Firmware: GM4OA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 56 57 57 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 50
Write 58.9
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 56.3
36% 49.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 51%
WDC WD50 00AAKS-75V0A0 500GB
113GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 77 91 91 91 90 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.1% Below average
Read 95.2
Write 93.5
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 87.8
114% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FJ 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.4% Poor
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 8.5
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 140
28% 140 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A10N-9830E Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A10N-9830E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $46
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback