PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 37.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Biostar A10N-9830E (all builds) |
Memory | 5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 7680 x 4320 - 32 Bit 色彩 |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191230 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Oct 09 '21 at 18:31 |
Run Duration | 171 Seconds |
Run User | HKG-User |
Background CPU | 10% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-9830P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
|
44.4%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
37.7%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$40
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0614B0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 161 315 172 294 145 MB/s
|
106%
Outstanding
|
|||
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
32GB free
Firmware: GM4OA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 56 57 57 56 MB/s
|
30.6%
Below average
|
|||
WDC WD50 00AAKS-75V0A0 500GB
113GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 77 91 91 91 90 MB/s
|
37.1%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FJ 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
27.4%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples | 33x |
RX 6500-XTAMD $140Bench 50%, 2,413 samples | 4x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 15% - Very poor | Total price: $46 |