Acer Aspire XC-780

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire XC-780  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-780
Memory9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160426
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 09 '21 at 12:00
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 106
2-Core 209
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 397
53% 396 Pts
64-Core 402
25% 402 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 2164 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 26.3
Parallax 20.9
16% 22.4 fps
MRender 21.2
Gravity 21.2
Splatting 19
17% 20.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SNS8151S396GG 96GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM02.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 53 39 40 43 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
44% Average
Read 354
Write 68.2
Mixed 96.6
SusWrite 41.4
30% 140 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 12
79% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 92.8
DQ Mixed 12.1
33% 71.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
867GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 192 198 200 199 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 184
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 190
119% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 500GB
208GB free, PID a007
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 76 77 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 70.8
Write 70.5
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 74.6
86% 63.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5143DB0-CPB 0215 CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
60.5% Good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 17.3
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 17.7
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 39: 5R 4G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
39% 12% 93 166 96 60 24.5" 1920 1080 AOC2590 2590G5
Typical Aspire XC-780 Builds (Compare 418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-780

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $161
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback