Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive340% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '21 at 02:52
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$409
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 114
2-Core 230
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 895
80% 677 Pts
64-Core 1,217
75% 1,217 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
4.98% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 9.2
6% 9.13 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 7.6
Splatting 1
2% 3.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.98%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2200 2237 2216 1925 1489 1528 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
340% Outstanding
Read 2,585
Write 1,880
Mixed 1,392
SusWrite 1,932
436% 1,948 MB/s
4K Read 60.3
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 78.1
274% 98.4 MB/s
DQ Read 995
DQ Write 537
DQ Mixed 440
414% 657 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 340%
Great: 435%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 214 213 212 214 214 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 100%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
48GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 1.2 7.2 8.5 13 14 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 82.6
Write 34.9
Mixed 0.2
SusWrite 9
31% 31.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.3
73% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
75.8% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 23.2
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 23.5
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 1 1 144 48.9" 1280 720 SAM0E5E C49HG9x
Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $438
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback