Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	12.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6200 Six-Core-$40 5,908 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Memory 77.4 1-Core 65.7 2-Core 127 55% 90 Pts	4-Core 216 8-Core 297 32% 256 Pts	64-Core 299 18% 299 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT 20,826 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Gigabyte(1458 3481) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	4.8% Terrible	Lighting 5.9 Reflection 12.3 Parallax 2.2 5% 6.8 fps	MRender 9.4 Gravity 4.5 Splatting 4.4 5% 6.1 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.8% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
APS-SL3N-256 256GB 728 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 174GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0918A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 146 27 8.7 10 6.8 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	12.5% Very poor	Read 229 Write 180 Mixed 11.7 SusWrite 35.3 25% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 6.8 4K Mixed 0.3 4% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 181GB free Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 87 87 87 88 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	Read 89 Write 81.8 Mixed 48.2 SusWrite 86.7 56% 76.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 78,181 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM 1876 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	51.3% Above average	MC Read 23.2 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 18.9 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 13.7 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 85.5 47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 62%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

RAM
2x4GBAdataBench 60%, 13,050 samples	27x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	7x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	6x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $265

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16