Asus A88XM-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 12 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus A88XM-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141105
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 08 '21 at 09:26
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Memory 38.5
1-Core 46
2-Core 69.9
32% 51.5 Pts
4-Core 81
8-Core 84.2
11% 82.6 Pts
64-Core 89.7
6% 89.7 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.4
Reflection 18.8
Parallax 19.5
16% 19.2 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 17.8
16% 17.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 16%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$160
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 103 158 201 163 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 290
Write 257
Mixed 260
SusWrite 131
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 49.6
4K Mixed 24.5
89% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 199
148% 196 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 134%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
1TB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 14 15 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 21.7
Write 23
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 15.2
28% 20.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.4
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14%
Great: 56%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
110GB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 14 15 16 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 22.2
Write 24.3
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 15.1
28% 21 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
21.8% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 9.1
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 7.1
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 210
19% 210 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical A88XM-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $300Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $220Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $300Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback