Asus G11CD-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus G11CD-K  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G11CD-K
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180316
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 08 '21 at 01:36
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 94
1-Core 143
2-Core 277
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 708
72% 584 Pts
64-Core 709
44% 709 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$394
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3576 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 252
Parallax 157
138% 193 fps
MRender 197
Gravity 161
Splatting 136
131% 165 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 267 279 274 289 302 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 407
Mixed 414
SusWrite 266
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 59.5
201% 71.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 354
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 113%
Great: 129%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
239GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 258 266 269 298 329 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 503
Write 390
Mixed 367
SusWrite 268
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 15.7
64% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 36.4
83% 165 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 100%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
170GB free
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 370 394 396 264 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 350
Write 360
Mixed 357
SusWrite 303
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 69.3
237% 85.5 MB/s
DQ Read 412
DQ Write 404
DQ Mixed 700
446% 505 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 124%
Great: 299%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
163GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 278 291 294 323 355 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 408
Mixed 409
SusWrite 291
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 65.5
216% 74.4 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 354
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 119%
Great: 137%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
658GB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 164 163 164 166 166 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 117
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 163
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 26.7
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 27.8
78% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 27.5" 1280 720 SAM0C4D U28E590
Typical G11CD-K Builds (Compare 1,736 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus G11CD-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $196
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback