Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite A210 (all builds)
Motherboard	ATI SB600
Memory	0.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20071207
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 07 '21 at 20:06
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-60-$28 1,111 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket M2/S1G1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	30.4% Below average	Memory 53.1 1-Core 28.7 2-Core 52.3 30% 44.7 Pts	4-Core 46 8-Core 50.7 6% 48.3 Pts	64-Core 49 3% 49 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 44%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS542520K9SA00 200GB 379 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: BBDOC33P SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 12 1.8 0.8 1.1 1.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	4.5% Terrible	Read 9.4 Write 21.3 Mixed 8.7 SusWrite 6.1 8% 11.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.4 62% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 4.5% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	9.06% Terrible	MC Read 1.9 MC Write 4.6 MC Mixed 2.5 8% 3 GB/s	SC Read 0.6 SC Write 1.1 SC Mixed 0.2 2% 0.63 GB/s	Latency 150 27% 150 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.06% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core TK-57AMDBench 30%, 456 samples	1x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 2600ATIBench 1%, 487 samples	1x

RAM
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16