Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX516PM
Memory16.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 07 '21 at 19:28
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11370H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 66.8
1-Core 121
2-Core 296
83% 161 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 707
74% 593 Pts
64-Core 731
45% 731 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 16E2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.6% Poor
Lighting 29.2
Reflection 30.1
Parallax 31.5
24% 30.3 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 39.6
Splatting 22
23% 29.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
297GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1227 1233 1233 684 322 270 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,279
Write 1,240
Mixed 1,105
SusWrite 828
250% 1,113 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 62.5
211% 75 MB/s
DQ Read 1,109
DQ Write 444
DQ Mixed 859
614% 804 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 202%
Great: 253%
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNW020T8 2TB
502GB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 577 152 157 142 160 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 1,089
Write 323
Mixed 864
SusWrite 272
141% 637 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 68.2
234% 83.8 MB/s
DQ Read 945
DQ Write 441
DQ Mixed 578
459% 655 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 164%
Great: 302%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 G Skill Intl F4-2666C19-16GRS 24GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
69.4% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 21.1
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 13.9
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 144 15.5" 1280 720 NCP004D
Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM Builds (Compare 5,829 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback