Monster TULPAR T7 V21.8

Performance Results


Gaming 98% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 104% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	332% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Monster TULPAR T7 V21.8 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER TULPAR T7 V21.8
Memory	24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit renk,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210803
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 07 '21 at 14:14
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-11800H 56,029 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	87.5% Excellent	Memory 62.5 1-Core 170 2-Core 338 98% 190 Pts	4-Core 601 8-Core 1,171 105% 886 Pts	64-Core 1,388 86% 1,388 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop) 45,297 User benchmarks, average bench 114% Device(1D05 1147) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7212 Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	110% Outstanding	Lighting 142 Reflection 195 Parallax 122 116% 153 fps	MRender 167 Gravity 120 Splatting 114 107% 134 fps
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 127%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 512GB 6,250 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 360GB free (System drive) Firmware: GXA7301Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 2868 2436 867 860 870 875 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	332% Outstanding	Read 2,194 Write 2,860 Mixed 2,656 SusWrite 1,463 518% 2,293 MB/s	4K Read 74 4K Write 170 4K Mixed 101 331% 115 MB/s	DQ Read 1,302 DQ Write 1,028 DQ Mixed 1,151 865% 1,160 MB/s
Poor: 166% ↑ This bench: 332% Great: 433%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GB 15,521 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.7% Good	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 31.8 MC Mixed 25.5 74% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 28.3 SC Mixed 13.5 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 32: 2R 4G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
32%	31%	51	271	198	165	17.2"	2560 1440	BOE0977

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T7 V21.8 Builds (Compare 330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 104%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V21.8

CPU
Core i7-11800HIntelBench 88%, 56,029 samples	330x

GPU
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples	191x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 7%, 53,008 samples	139x

SSD
MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 512GBSamsungBench 310%, 6,250 samples	89x
MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TBSamsungBench 345%, 21,743 samples	79x
P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBCrucial $75Bench 200%, 52,084 samples	38x

RAM
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	56x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	38x
CT8G4SFRA32A.M8FRS 2x8GBCrucialBench 80%, 2,776 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16