Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium M processor 2.00GHz 23 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Memory 51.9 1-Core 19.9 2-Core 19.6 24% 30.5 Pts	4-Core 19.5 8-Core 19.6 3% 19.5 Pts	64-Core 19.9 1% 19.9 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
IC25N020ATCS04-0 20GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 1GB free (System drive) Firmware: CA2OA71A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 16 Write 14.6 Mixed 12.7 11% 14.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 51% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 10%
USB 2.0 Flash Disk 1GB 176 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 1GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 2 2 2 2 2 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	2.39% Terrible	Read 7.3 Write 1.8 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 2 4% 3.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.39% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	6.46% Terrible	MC Read 1.7 MC Write 1.7 MC Mixed 1.5 5% 1.63 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 2 SC Mixed 1.5 5% 1.73 GB/s	Latency 154 26% 154 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.46% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16