Asus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210810
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 06 '21 at 19:56
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	Memory 82.1 1-Core 118 2-Core 228 80% 143 Pts	4-Core 410 8-Core 416 55% 413 Pts	64-Core 453 28% 453 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% PNY(196E 1327) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	44.1% Average	Lighting 57.5 Reflection 57.9 Parallax 50.2 47% 55.2 fps	MRender 42.9 Gravity 51.8 Splatting 46.9 39% 47.2 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1H5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 181 244 265 205 327 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.7% Below average	Read 132 Write 93.8 Mixed 82.7 SusWrite 252 32% 140 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 17.6 4K Mixed 9.9 41% 13.3 MB/s	DQ Read 14.1 DQ Write 15.6 DQ Mixed 14 11% 14.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 913GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 200 205 205 206 206 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 205 Write 197 Mixed 86.7 SusWrite 203 126% 173 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB 35,395 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	MC Read 38 MC Write 39.9 MC Mixed 36 108% 38 GB/s	SC Read 22.2 SC Write 37.2 SC Mixed 27 82% 28.8 GB/s	Latency 76.7 52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II Builds (Compare 2,250 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 87%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 82%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	437x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $151Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	330x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	217x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	257x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	154x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	123x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	79x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	68x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	67x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	145x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	74x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	65x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $491

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16