Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 190% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 185% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	206% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	264% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190528
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 06 '21 at 15:25
Run Duration	362 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285 15,468 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	Memory 91.7 1-Core 83.8 2-Core 217 74% 131 Pts	4-Core 512 8-Core 893 85% 703 Pts	64-Core 1,340 83% 1,340 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660 155,335 User benchmarks, average bench 204% EVGA(3842 3967); 12G-P5-3967-KR,evga FTW3 ultra 3080-Ti CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	206% Outstanding	Lighting 295 Reflection 296 Parallax 370 241% 320 fps	MRender 366 Gravity 265 Splatting 190 215% 274 fps
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 206% Great: 225%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 501GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1060 1338 1335 1395 1433 1379 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	264% Outstanding	Read 2,217 Write 2,144 Mixed 1,617 SusWrite 1,323 410% 1,825 MB/s	4K Read 55 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 71 232% 78 MB/s	DQ Read 620 DQ Write 400 DQ Mixed 537 393% 519 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 264% Great: 435%
WDC WUH721818ALE6L4 18TB 372 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 4.5TB free Firmware: PCGNW232 SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 193 194 199 190 194 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	25.4% Poor	Read 186 Write 181 Mixed 116 SusWrite 193 38% 169 MB/s	4K Read 8.9 4K Write 15.2 4K Mixed 0.5 22% 8.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1.2 DQ Write 7.4 DQ Mixed 5.6 4% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 38%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 183GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 456 455 458 443 451 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 464 Write 448 Mixed 374 SusWrite 452 98% 435 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 82.4 4K Mixed 43.9 146% 52.3 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 353 265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 124%
Samsung PM810 2.5" 7mm 128GB 4,365 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 39GB free Firmware: AXM08D1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 214 162 171 160 171 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	43% Average	Read 239 Write 156 Mixed 120 SusWrite 173 38% 172 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 33.2 4K Mixed 16 63% 21.9 MB/s	DQ Read 123 DQ Write 39.5 DQ Mixed 22.8 32% 61.9 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 50%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$180 31,076 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 859GB free Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 457 456 458 450 459 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 460 Write 445 Mixed 437 SusWrite 455 101% 449 MB/s	4K Read 41.4 4K Write 86.2 4K Mixed 55.8 180% 61.1 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 354 266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 136%
Avago MR9361-8i 24TB 22.5TB free Firmware: 4.68 SusWrite @10s intervals: 703 649 572 648 565 682 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Drobo 5D3 70.5TB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 53.5TB free, PID 3533 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Read 42.2 Write 39.6 Mixed 42.2 SusWrite 41.3 56% 41.3 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 7.9 4K Mixed 4.1 427% 5.7 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 122%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 4x8GB-$165 7,179 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	125% Outstanding	MC Read 55.5 MC Write 44.2 MC Mixed 50.1 143% 49.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 20.7 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 64.6 62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	10	8	60	72.3"	1280 720	GSM0001 LG TV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 98%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	38x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	28x
Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	31x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	27x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	21x

SSD
SSDSC2BB150G7 150GBIntelBench 52%, 328 samples	20x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	11x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x

RAM
M393A1K43DB2-CWE 8x8GBSamsungBench 146%, 50 samples	6x
SP008GXLZU320BSA 4x8GBSilicon-PowerBench 99%, 50 samples	6x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 1,230 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $770

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16