Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory18.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 06 '21 at 07:19
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 79.4
1-Core 150
2-Core 292
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 834
81% 667 Pts
64-Core 1,223
76% 1,223 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Asus(1043 875D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 112
Parallax 128
101% 121 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 126
Splatting 108
108% 136 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB-$105
217GB free
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 329 249 243 207 254 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 455
Write 436
Mixed 314
SusWrite 284
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 36.1
122% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 179
166% 254 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 108%
CT250MX500SSD4 250GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 406 401 418 413 410 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 414
Mixed 412
SusWrite 408
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 42.3
139% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 240
179% 239 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 121%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
411GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 94 94 98 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 110
Write 105
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 95.4
73% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59%
Great: 112%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$75
822GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 91 99 68 84 101 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 68%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
173GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 75 76 76 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 96
Write 101
Mixed 54
SusWrite 75
108% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88.4% Excellent
MC Read 37
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 36.4
93% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 30.4
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 58: 6R 7G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
58% 47% 43 101 8 165 27" 1920 1080 SPT0A05 Sceptre M25
Typical TUF B450M-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,926 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $345
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback