Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	25.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds)
Memory	2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190830
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 05 '21 at 08:33
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75 104,122 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	63.6% Good	Memory 58.9 1-Core 92.9 2-Core 217 65% 123 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 402 53% 397 Pts	64-Core 356 22% 356 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362 42,960 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gainward(10B0 1183) 2GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1527 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 446.14 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.4% Poor	Lighting 29.2 Reflection 29 Parallax 40 24% 32.7 fps	MRender 37.8 Gravity 37.9 Splatting 30.7 29% 35.5 fps
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1Z40102 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 338 Write 318 Mixed 9.5 49% 222 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.2 27% 6.77 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 69GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 121 121 124 121 112 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	Read 161 Write 130 Mixed 79.5 SusWrite 115 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 1x8GB 14,156 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.8% Below average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 10.9 MC Mixed 13.7 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 11.1 23% 8.07 GB/s	Latency 131 30% 131 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 31: 4R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
31%	36%	25	106	8	60	23.5"	1920 1080	PHLC0D1 PHL 243V5

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,049 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,463x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	1,307x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	1,006x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	949x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	735x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	654x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	716x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	340x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	284x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	293x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	226x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $357

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16