Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 117% UFO	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 132% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210319
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 05 '21 at 00:40
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Memory 78.8 1-Core 134 2-Core 267 87% 160 Pts	4-Core 534 8-Core 1,058 94% 796 Pts	64-Core 2,012 124% 2,012 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Gigabyte(1458 405E) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	129% Outstanding	Lighting 182 Reflection 167 Parallax 156 148% 168 fps	MRender 186 Gravity 132 Splatting 114 114% 144 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB 14,526 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 305GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 289 290 293 293 291 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Read 452 Write 281 Mixed 276 SusWrite 291 73% 325 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 39.1 4K Mixed 22.4 80% 27.3 MB/s	DQ Read 80.7 DQ Write 75.1 DQ Mixed 90.2 64% 82 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 97%
Samsung PSSD T7 500GB 1,446 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 301GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 340 340 338 341 340 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	70.9% Very good	Read 321 Write 348 Mixed 324 SusWrite 340 75% 333 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 39 4K Mixed 26.9 87% 29 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 205 DQ Mixed 228 171% 227 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$299 20,912 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	89.4% Excellent	MC Read 38.2 MC Write 30.3 MC Mixed 31.7 95% 33.4 GB/s	SC Read 22.2 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 27.1 64% 22.2 GB/s	Latency 82.7 48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 57: 6R 6G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
57%	29%	73	320	263	60	34.1"	2752 1152	ACR054F Acer X34 P

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,188 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $475

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,916x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $185Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,341x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	1,103x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	1,103x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	879x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	611x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	846x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	707x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	421x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	434x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	185x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $95Bench 95%, 56,114 samples	156x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,730

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $183	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16