Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512FJ
Memory6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, , 2400 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190826
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 04 '21 at 21:33
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User BOL-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 134
2-Core 215
85% 146 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 440
49% 386 Pts
64-Core 439
27% 439 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX230
Asus(1043 1851) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6259
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 12.8
Reflection 15.3
Parallax 12.3
10% 13.5 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 14.3
11% 12.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100n 256G 256GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 268 284 287 288 282 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 386
Write 335
Mixed 291
SusWrite 288
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 17.6
109% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 44
82% 158 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 102%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
911GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 105 107 110 117 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 138
Write 115
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 111
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.6
217% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K44BM0-CRC Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
62.9% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 17.5
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 20.3
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO21ED
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ Builds (Compare 216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback