Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180608
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 04 '21 at 15:46
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	79.7% Very good	Memory 74.9 1-Core 118 2-Core 210 75% 134 Pts	4-Core 454 8-Core 707 72% 581 Pts	64-Core 943 58% 943 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 864D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.6% Poor	Lighting 33.9 Reflection 39.1 Parallax 36.5 28% 36.5 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 39.6 Splatting 26.6 28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB 21,984 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 204 243 221 157 156 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	40.7% Average	Read 365 Write 288 Mixed 84.4 SusWrite 201 52% 235 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 9.9 4K Mixed 11.9 42% 11.9 MB/s	DQ Read 33.1 DQ Write 12.4 DQ Mixed 14.4 13% 20 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 56%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65 22,230 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 336GB free Firmware: CC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 103 105 106 106 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	62.3% Good	Read 113 Write 104 Mixed 59.5 SusWrite 104 70% 95.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FBD 2x8GB 5,007 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	96.5% Outstanding	MC Read 38.2 MC Write 36.1 MC Mixed 31.3 100% 35.2 GB/s	SC Read 24.3 SC Write 35.3 SC Mixed 27.6 83% 29.1 GB/s	Latency 90.6 44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 48: 4R 7G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
48%	41%	44	320	250	60	22"	1680 1050	ACR0009 Acer X223W

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,022 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	838x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	628x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	291x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	296x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	237x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	226x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	102x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	90x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	72x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	179x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	134x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	126x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $480

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16