Razer Blade

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	79.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Razer Blade (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer CH530
Memory	4.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190709
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 04 '21 at 14:00
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Memory 84.6 1-Core 128 2-Core 252 86% 155 Pts	4-Core 461 8-Core 668 71% 565 Pts	64-Core 789 49% 789 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 87%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1A58 2005) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.21% Terrible	Lighting 6.3 Reflection 101 Parallax 8.9 5% 38.8 fps	MRender 11.2 Gravity 7.5 Splatting 11.3 8% 10 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.21% Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q) 10,818 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Device(1A58 2005) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 425.45 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.3% Very good	Lighting 92.9 Reflection 101 Parallax 97.8 76% 97.1 fps	MRender 144 Gravity 93.9 Splatting 87.9 86% 109 fps
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 94%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D512 512GB 4,424 User benchmarks, average bench 168% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: C490903 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 75 90 335 368 234 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	148% Outstanding	Read 1,470 Write 106 Mixed 186 SusWrite 192 104% 489 MB/s	4K Read 39.5 4K Write 73.5 4K Mixed 48.6 161% 53.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,175 DQ Write 54.7 DQ Mixed 7.3 158% 412 MB/s
Poor: 98% ↑ This bench: 148% Great: 228%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB 43,895 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	MC Read 29.9 MC Write 29.7 MC Mixed 22.1 78% 27.2 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 28.9 SC Mixed 23.1 67% 23.5 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	2	4	2	60	15.5"	1280 720	SHP14D4 LQ156M1JW08

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,017 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,056x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,066x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	469x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,443x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	595x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	396x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	816x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	287x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	248x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	1,751x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	370x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,214 samples	290x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16