Asrock A320M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170612
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 03 '21 at 12:45
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$255
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 69.7
1-Core 90.9
2-Core 163
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 434
49% 373 Pts
64-Core 470
32% 470 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$230
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.41
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.1% Average
Lighting 52.3
Reflection 66
Parallax 58.3
42% 58.9 fps
MRender 59.9
Gravity 66.2
Splatting 60.8
53% 62.3 fps
Poor: 50%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 56%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$35
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 205 97 7.3 6.3 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 486
Write 394
Mixed 388
SusWrite 72.5
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.4
44% 11 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 91%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$80
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 35 35 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 150
Write 33.5
Mixed 43.9
SusWrite 34
48% 65.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.3% Very good
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 27.3
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 20.4
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 36: 3R 5G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
36% 82% 17 105 4 165 27" 1920 1080 LHC2700 N27FW
History: Score 22: 2R 2G 6B | Score 36: 3R 5G 6B
Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 3,755 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $282
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $300Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $220Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $300Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback