HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	89.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 84FD
Memory	7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200528
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Oct 03 '21 at 02:49
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	26%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$295 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Memory 70.2 1-Core 128 2-Core 256 81% 151 Pts	4-Core 456 8-Core 736 73% 596 Pts	64-Core 770 48% 770 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% HP(103C 8557) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing below potential (53^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	89.7% Excellent	Lighting 113 Reflection 93.7 Parallax 103 92% 103 fps	MRender 135 Gravity 95.7 Splatting 88.6 85% 106 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GB 6,904 User benchmarks, average bench 131% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80002C00 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 422 Write 97.2 Mixed 215 53% 245 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 60.7 4K Mixed 19.8 79% 31.6 MB/s	DQ Read 568 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 141 153% 270 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 182%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB 18,390 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 176GB free Firmware: 0304 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 90 80 82 84 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	49.3% Average	Read 85.8 Write 118 Mixed 85.8 SusWrite 86 70% 93.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GB 8,406 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	41% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 13.3 41% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 12.7 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 58: 8R 6G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
58%	36%	39	212	119	100	24.5"	1920 1080	HPN3425 OMEN by HP 25

History: Score 28: 4R 1G 5B | Score 58: 8R 6G 0B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 67%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	2,373x
Core i7-9700Intel $260Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	2,004x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	707x

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	1,322x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	829x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	709x

SSD
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	1,393x
hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBSKBench 123%, 30,266 samples	1,223x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GBWDCBench 152%, 17,295 samples	291x

RAM
HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 46%, 8,406 samples	1,890x
HP26D4U6D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 47%, 4,169 samples	777x
HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 4,094 samples	451x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 108% - Outstanding

Total price: $343

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16