HP ZBook 17 G5

Performance Results

Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 72%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics82.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP ZBook 17 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 842D
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '21 at 21:53
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2176M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Memory 94.3
1-Core 137
2-Core 272
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 777
81% 653 Pts
64-Core 861
53% 861 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P5200
HP(103C 842D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver.
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.2% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 125
Parallax 106
83% 111 fps
MRender 85.3
Gravity 105
Splatting 104
81% 98 fps
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 95%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GB
436GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1613 1011 614 614 617 613 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 1,982
Write 1,439
Mixed 749
SusWrite 847
279% 1,254 MB/s
4K Read 68.6
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 86.1
288% 97.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,336
DQ Write 742
DQ Mixed 1,050
778% 1,043 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 267%
Great: 295%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1P24HC8T1-BSFS 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
76.6% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 20.9
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 25.3
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 11 9 60 17.2" 1280 720 AUO149B
Typical ZBook 17 G5 Builds (Compare 713 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop 71%
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 17 G5

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback