Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140409
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 01 '21 at 22:30
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$100
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 73.5
2-Core 139
58% 96.8 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 307
35% 272 Pts
64-Core 308
19% 308 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Asus(1043 83F7) 2GB
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Lighting 42.5
Reflection 38.2
Parallax 54.8
35% 45.2 fps
MRender 50.9
Gravity 52.7
Splatting 41.5
39% 48.4 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 397 176 156 216 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 486
Write 415
Mixed 396
SusWrite 241
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 17.6
105% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 28.4
68% 140 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
931GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 198 196 198 200 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 123
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 197
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
WD Elements 2620 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 109 107 108 107 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 115
Write 103
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 107
130% 98 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
159% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-2GBXL F3-10666CL9-2GBNQ F3-12800CL9-2GBXL F3-10666CL9-2GBNQ 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.3% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 15.3
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 12.2
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 7.2" 1280 720 SAM07C0 SAMSUNG
Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 580 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback