Asrock A320M-HD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HD  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 28 '21 at 19:08
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
29% Poor
Memory 23
1-Core 51.9
2-Core 108
32% 60.9 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 322
31% 254 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 29%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.3% Above average
Lighting 68.6
Reflection 70.8
Parallax 0.1
56% 46.5 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 66.4
Splatting 64.9
54% 66.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 83 6.6 7.8 13 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 345
Write 162
Mixed 168
SusWrite 58.3
40% 183 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 11.3
4K Mixed 13.3
44% 12.7 MB/s
DQ Read 37.3
DQ Write 56.3
DQ Mixed 17.8
22% 37.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
128GB free
Firmware: KC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 129 130 129 114 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 127
Write 119
Mixed 62.4
SusWrite 115
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
150GB free
Firmware: KC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 36 53 85 88 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Read 9
Write 29.3
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 71.7
24% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
33% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB-$25
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
28.5% Poor
MC Read 13
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 8.5
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 6.1
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 299
13% 299 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 21.5" 1280 720 AOC2242 T2242we
Typical A320M-HD Builds (Compare 722 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $233
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback