Asus P5K SE/EPU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus P5K SE/EPU (all builds)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20081020
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 28 '21 at 01:25
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170 16,719 User benchmarks, average bench 51% LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	51.4% Above average	Memory 69.5 1-Core 49.6 2-Core 100 46% 73.2 Pts	4-Core 194 8-Core 195 26% 194 Pts	64-Core 198 12% 198 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	Lighting 39.7 Reflection 48.2 Parallax 39.1 32% 42.3 fps	MRender 38.8 Gravity 41.4 Splatting 27.5 29% 35.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: 505ABBF1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 187 Write 145 Mixed 152 36% 161 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 51.8 4K Mixed 29.6 105% 35.9 MB/s	DQ Read 32.9 DQ Write 78.7 DQ Mixed 37.5 34% 49.7 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 73%
Samsung 850 120GB 3,514 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 11GB free Firmware: MVT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 2,709 Write 45.8 Mixed 89.3 197% 948 MB/s	4K Read 415 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 5.8 638% 141 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 115%
TOSHIBA STOR.E ALU 2S 1TB 946 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 837GB free, PID 0b1a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 14.7 Write 19.5 Mixed 12.5 20% 15.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.2 18% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	21.9% Poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 6.4 20% 7.1 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 7.4 SC Mixed 5.7 18% 6.3 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5K SE/EPU Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K SE/EPU

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	16x
Core2 Quad Q9300Intel $38Bench 46%, 10,428 samples	8x
Xeon E5450Intel $195Bench 51%, 10,801 samples	8x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	6x
GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples	5x
GeForce GTX 285NvidiaBench 9%, 2,842 samples	5x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	4x
Fury 240GBHyperX $193Bench 71%, 27,826 samples	3x
PLUS 480GBSandiskBench 48%, 58,990 samples	3x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	41x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	12x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $180

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16