Gigabyte GA-B550 GAMING X V2

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B550 GAMING X V2 (all builds)
Memory	3.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200918
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 27 '21 at 20:55
Run Duration	370 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$506 50,170 User benchmarks, average bench 89% AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	69.5% Good	Memory 65 1-Core 112 2-Core 216 72% 131 Pts	4-Core 396 8-Core 773 69% 585 Pts	64-Core 1,873 116% 1,873 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7350 1,650 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B E127) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.08% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 1.7 1% 1.73 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 2 1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.08% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 310 316 314 309 316 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 494 Write 444 Mixed 394 SusWrite 319 93% 413 MB/s	4K Read 40 4K Write 38.4 4K Mixed 21.3 108% 33.2 MB/s	DQ Read 749 DQ Write 599 DQ Mixed 833 580% 727 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 236%
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 4TB 370 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 3.5TB free Firmware: VB421D57 SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 84 143 86 92 96 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	20.7% Poor	Read 119 Write 122 Mixed 78.3 SusWrite 124 25% 111 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 2.3 30% 7.3 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 324%
Viper VP4300 1TB 234 User benchmarks, average bench 423% 845GB free Firmware: V1.2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 583 552 446 578 484 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 639 Write 758 Mixed 532 SusWrite 519 138% 612 MB/s	4K Read 15 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 5.4 94% 47 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 648 DQ Mixed 37.5 130% 267 MB/s
Poor: 218% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 565%
Seagate ST18000NM000J-2TV103 18TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 12TB free Firmware: SN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 250 252 253 250 254 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 10% Great: 10%
20 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 5.5TB free Firmware: 010A SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 7.3 7.4 7.3 7.4 7.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 35.7 Write 32.7 Mixed 37.8 SusWrite 7.3 21% 28.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1 198% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 101%
20 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 5.5TB free Firmware: 010A SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 7.3 7.4 7.3 7.4 7.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 33.5 Write 33.1 Mixed 30.3 SusWrite 7.3 20% 26 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 101%
20 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 15GB free Firmware: 010A SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 30.2 Write 34.6 Mixed 30.1 SusWrite 7.3 19% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 101%
20 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 15GB free Firmware: 010A SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.2 7.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 38.8 Write 29.3 Mixed 31.7 SusWrite 7.3 20% 26.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.4 98% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 101%
20 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 14GB free Firmware: 010A SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 76 79 84 74 79 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	58.6% Above average	Read 127 Write 127 Mixed 67.1 SusWrite 76.1 73% 99.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.4 194% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 101%
20 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 15GB free Firmware: 010A SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 76 79 84 74 79 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Read 166 Write 179 Mixed 74.8 SusWrite 76.1 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.5 177% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 101%
Seagate ST3000NM0053 3TB 816 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 57GB free Firmware: G00A SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 88 87 87 86 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	66.9% Good	Read 146 Write 139 Mixed 77.4 SusWrite 86.5 83% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 198% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 101%
Seagate ST3000NM0053 3TB 816 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 58GB free Firmware: G00A SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 87 86 84 81 86 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	69% Good	Read 155 Write 141 Mixed 70.8 SusWrite 84.6 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1 232% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 101%
Seagate ST3000NM0053 3TB 816 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 189GB free Firmware: G007 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 37 31 34 37 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 57% Great: 101%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 39GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 13 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	23.7% Poor	Read 34.2 Write 37.6 Mixed 23.6 SusWrite 13.5 36% 27.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.7 200% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 24%
ST500DM0 02-1BD142 500GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 60GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 32.4 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 36.5 43% 31.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX3200C16D4/32GX 4x31.8GB 1,142 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 4 of 4 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3333 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	MC Read 32.9 MC Write 27.4 MC Mixed 31.6 88% 30.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 17.5 SC Mixed 34.4 60% 21.1 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 163%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B550 GAMING X V2 Builds (Compare 4,766 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 91%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 GAMING X V2

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $149Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,585x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $200Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	668x
Ryzen 5 5600AMD $145Bench 93%, 9,841 samples	347x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	546x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	457x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	383x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	219x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	146x
SNV2S1000G 1TBKingstonBench 260%, 75,739 samples	123x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	207x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	199x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	149x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $553

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16