Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-6010 APU R2 Graphics 1,618 User benchmarks, average bench 22% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.35 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	Memory 50.1 1-Core 20.8 2-Core 40.4 26% 37.1 Pts	4-Core 39.6 8-Core 40.1 5% 39.8 Pts	64-Core 40.6 2% 40.6 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics 7,644 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.9.3 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.26% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 2.7 Parallax 1.7 1% 1.87 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 2.4 2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.26% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS2 40G2G0A-00JH30 240GB 768 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 214GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF87 SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 140 124 128 131 131 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	40.3% Average	Read 370 Write 264 Mixed 173 SusWrite 144 53% 238 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 23.5 4K Mixed 8 46% 15.7 MB/s	DQ Read 88.3 DQ Write 53.1 DQ Mixed 21.8 29% 54.4 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata 4G1600CL11 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	13.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 5 13% 4.4 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 5 13% 4.47 GB/s	Latency 160 25% 160 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 14%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 24%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
E1-6010 APU R2 GraphicsAMDBench 22%, 1,618 samples	22x

GPU
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 1%, 7,644 samples	22x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
Burst 480GBPatriotBench 76%, 16,899 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	3x
HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 2x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 9,036 samples	2x
8G1600CL11 1x8GBSamsungBench 24%, 50 samples	2x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16