Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210320
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Sep 27 '21 at 10:18
Run Duration	278 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$152 383,420 User benchmarks, average bench 96% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	95% Outstanding	Memory 77 1-Core 160 2-Core 316 98% 184 Pts	4-Core 606 8-Core 900 94% 753 Pts	64-Core 1,123 70% 1,123 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 95% Great: 107%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 85F4) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Lighting 18 Reflection 18.4 Parallax 18.7 15% 18.4 fps	MRender 16 Gravity 19 Splatting 16.9 14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 849GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR033 SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 426 431 435 370 398 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 504 Write 434 Mixed 395 SusWrite 413 98% 436 MB/s	4K Read 39 4K Write 85.8 4K Mixed 50.2 169% 58.3 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 182 141% 194 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 125%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94 262,559 User benchmarks, average bench 251% 908GB free Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2052 2152 2129 2152 2151 2153 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	337% Outstanding	Read 1,759 Write 2133 Mixed 1,882 SusWrite 2,131 448% 1,976 MB/s	4K Read 61.1 4K Write 149 4K Mixed 85 281% 98.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,282 DQ Write 951 DQ Mixed 1,081 818% 1,105 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 337% Great: 365%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78 30,011 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 529GB free Firmware: MK7OA840 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 92 96 95 96 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	Read 80.5 Write 74.4 Mixed 46.8 SusWrite 94.8 54% 74.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 110 113 113 113 120 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	52% Above average	Read 69 Write 88.2 Mixed 66.2 SusWrite 112 62% 83.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 90%
Seagate Desktop 8TB 4,842 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 4TB free Firmware: 040B SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 152 157 157 159 159 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	78.2% Very good	Read 116 Write 119 Mixed 94.6 SusWrite 155 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.7 309% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 93%
Asmt ASM1153E 2TB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 158GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 21 20 20 20 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Read 40.2 Write 32.5 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 20.7 23% 31 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 110%
USB 3.0 4TB 136 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 910GB free Firmware: 0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Read 39.5 Write 35.6 Mixed 29.8 SusWrite 20.1 23% 31.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB 101,975 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69% Good	MC Read 31.7 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 25.3 70% 24.4 GB/s	SC Read 24.7 SC Write 15.9 SC Mixed 26 63% 22.2 GB/s	Latency 86.3 46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	23"	1280 720	ACI23A2 ASUS PB238

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,723 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 182%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 181%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

CPU
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,334x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,054x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $152Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	880x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	510x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	399x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $499Bench 158%, 218,061 samples	361x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	438x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	383x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	206x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	157x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	124x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 101%, 32,191 samples	116x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $934

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16