MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)

Performance Results


Gaming 107% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 116% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	329% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Micro-Star MS-7C35
Motherboard	MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) (all builds)
Memory	18.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210513
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 27 '21 at 08:36
Run Duration	514 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	91.7% Outstanding	Memory 82.9 1-Core 145 2-Core 289 93% 172 Pts	4-Core 539 8-Core 915 88% 727 Pts	64-Core 1,965 122% 1,965 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6288) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Lighting 147 Reflection 150 Parallax 140 120% 146 fps	MRender 105 Gravity 149 Splatting 127 104% 127 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 683GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1454 1719 1676 1490 1485 1497 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	329% Outstanding	Read 2,497 Write 1,834 Mixed 1618 SusWrite 1,554 420% 1,876 MB/s	4K Read 65.1 4K Write 147 4K Mixed 88.2 290% 100 MB/s	DQ Read 1,253 DQ Write 735 DQ Mixed 967 727% 985 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 329% Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 634GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 882 308 645 481 482 482 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$250 44,466 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 55GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 451 453 459 462 459 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 439 Mixed 444 SusWrite 456 104% 460 MB/s	4K Read 37.7 4K Write 80.9 4K Mixed 48.8 162% 55.8 MB/s	DQ Read 222 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 202 152% 203 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 818GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 459 455 466 464 429 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 486 Write 441 Mixed 411 SusWrite 455 101% 448 MB/s	4K Read 39.5 4K Write 82.1 4K Mixed 49.3 166% 57 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 204 154% 205 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 453GB free Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1487 1492 1475 1526 1514 1436 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	278% Outstanding	Read 1,485 Write 1,400 Mixed 1,040 SusWrite 1,488 305% 1,354 MB/s	4K Read 50.4 4K Write 146 4K Mixed 69.9 243% 88.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1295 DQ Write 1,073 DQ Mixed 1,075 835% 1,148 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 278% Great: 353%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98 276,089 User benchmarks, average bench 394% 812GB free Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 3086 3230 3297 2486 1606 1630 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	316% Outstanding	Read 247 Write 3,218 Mixed 2,617 SusWrite 2,556 500% 2,160 MB/s	4K Read 75.2 4K Write 170 4K Mixed 104 337% 116 MB/s	DQ Read 1,296 DQ Write 725 DQ Mixed 1018 755% 1,013 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑ This bench: 316% Great: 488%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB-$190 7,103 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 40.3 MC Write 36.6 MC Mixed 37.6 109% 38.2 GB/s	SC Read 23.7 SC Write 22.8 SC Mixed 31 74% 25.8 GB/s	Latency 75.4 53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 142%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 28: 5R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
28%	33%	18	106	5	60	27"	2560 1440	DEL40EA DELL U2717D

History: Score 23: 4R 1G 0B | Score 40: 7R 1G 2B | Score 28: 5R 1G 0B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 164%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 187%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) - $358

CPU
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	451x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	440x
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $416Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	340x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	239x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	213x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $630Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	207x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	166x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	154x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $168Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	105x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	97x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	70x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	49x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,761

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16