Asrock X370M-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X370M-HDV (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180620
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Sep 27 '21 at 07:05
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	LKA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$125 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	46.7% Average	Memory 61.9 1-Core 47.6 2-Core 90.6 42% 66.7 Pts	4-Core 171 8-Core 323 30% 247 Pts	64-Core 391 24% 391 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670 21,442 User benchmarks, average bench 4% AMD(1002 1002) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.0 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.51% Terrible	Lighting 4.3 Reflection 4.1 Parallax 3.6 4% 4 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 5.9 4% 4.1 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.51% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Barun BMCXDGBNQSLSS1 128GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: P0819AS SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 162 162 162 163 165 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	64.3% Good	Read 486 Write 165 Mixed 217 SusWrite 162 57% 257 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 60.8 4K Mixed 26.5 94% 35.3 MB/s	DQ Read 95.3 DQ Write 163 DQ Mixed 108 88% 122 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 68%
Samsung HD160JJ 149GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 124GB free Firmware: ZM100-37 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 56 56 56 56 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Read 59 Write 10.5 Mixed 39.3 SusWrite 43 28% 38 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 32%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 32GB 1,207 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 18GB free, PID 00d2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 35 33 35 35 27 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 38.3 Write 31.8 Mixed 20 SusWrite 32.3 40% 30.6 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 25% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB 21,551 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	45.5% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 14.1 45% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 15.5 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 5: 0R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
5%	12%	24	58	45	60	0"	1600 900	Default

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370M-HDV Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X370M-HDV

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	23x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	7x
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	5x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	16x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	6x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	4x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x
SSD2SC480G1CS1754D117-533 480GBPNYBench 82%, 961 samples	3x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	4x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	3x
HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 8,943 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $283

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16