MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 148% UFO	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 138% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	167% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

System	Micro-Star MS-7C35
Motherboard	MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210122
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 27 '21 at 02:59
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	Memory 74.5 1-Core 159 2-Core 315 97% 183 Pts	4-Core 594 8-Core 906 93% 750 Pts	64-Core 1,133 70% 1,133 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% MSI(1462 3715) CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	167% Outstanding	Lighting 233 Reflection 213 Parallax 250 190% 232 fps	MRender 264 Gravity 228 Splatting 163 173% 218 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 167% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,937 Write 1,378 Mixed 654 291% 1323 MB/s	4K Read 49.4 4K Write 145 4K Mixed 63.9 233% 86.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1211 DQ Write 1,094 DQ Mixed 801 697% 1,035 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Seagate ST3500412AS 500GB 3,833 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 466GB free Firmware: CC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 108 110 110 109 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	59.7% Above average	Read 98.8 Write 99.5 Mixed 57.9 SusWrite 109 67% 91.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 63%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 64GB 1,861 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 55GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 8.5 9.6 10 11 8.6 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	5.68% Terrible	Read 22.2 Write 8 Mixed 5 SusWrite 8.9 12% 11 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 8% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.68% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4400 C19 Series 2x8GB 6,100 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	66.5% Good	MC Read 29.1 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 25.3 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 23.4 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 25.5 62% 21.5 GB/s	Latency 91.4 44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 137%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,112 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 164%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 187%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) - $358

CPU
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	452x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	440x
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $416Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	341x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	239x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	213x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	207x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	166x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	154x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $168Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	105x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	97x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	70x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	49x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,760

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16