PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 72.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 80.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7B98 |
Motherboard | MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) (all builds) |
Memory | 8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190222 |
Uptime | 4.5 Days |
Run Date | Sep 27 '21 at 00:25 |
Run Duration | 199 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 10% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
91.7%
Outstanding
|
||||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
EVGA(3842 1267) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
72.1%
Very good
|
|||
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 7B98) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6471
|
6.12%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SHSS37A480G 480GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM02.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 368 356 240 245 171 MB/s
|
80.9%
Excellent
|
|||
Corsair Force LE 240GB-$85
58GB free
Firmware: SAFC12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 211 176 140 175 176 MB/s
|
86.6%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Expansion 1.5TB
67GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 40 42 41 41 MB/s
|
20.9%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
68.1%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 9 | 7 | 144 | 24" | 1280 720 | BNQ7F31 BenQ XL2411Z |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 8,115x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 7,842x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 3,803x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 2,418x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 2,327x |
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 2,136x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 106% - Outstanding | Total price: $828 |