Asus X555QA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus X555QA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X555QA
Memory	7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190510
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 27 '21 at 00:01
Run Duration	255 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	60%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-9600P APU (2016 M.BR) 13,243 User benchmarks, average bench 33% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	27.1% Poor	Memory 35.7 1-Core 46.7 2-Core 81.2 32% 54.5 Pts	4-Core 104 8-Core 128 15% 116 Pts	64-Core 122 8% 122 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 13,858 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 122E) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.20.36.11 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	1.52% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 6.1 Parallax 8 0% 4.73 fps	MRender 3.3 Gravity 6.2 Splatting 5.9 4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.52% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 788GB free (System drive) Firmware: AX0R5J SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 69 78 75 68 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	40.3% Average	Read 65.5 Write 87.6 Mixed 29.9 SusWrite 74.9 47% 64.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.3 68% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Micron MT40A1G8WE-083E:B 12GB 222 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	19.4% Very poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 7.3 20% 7.07 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 5 13% 4.4 GB/s	Latency 223 18% 223 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 24%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 3: 0R 0G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
3%	7%	44	14	4	60	15.5"	1366 768	CMN15CA

History: Score 9: 1R 1G 1B | Score 3: 0R 0G 3B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X555QA Builds (Compare 121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X555QA

CPU
A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 35%, 17,422 samples	50x
A10-9620P APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 35%, 6,180 samples	36x
A10-9600P APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 33%, 13,243 samples	20x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	57x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 13,858 samples	55x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 6,884 samples	8x

SSD
SD9SB8W128G1102 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 107 samples	10x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GBBench 78%, 6,868 samples	9x
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GBBench 63%, 4,377 samples	5x

RAM
K4A8G085WB-BCPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 22%, 816 samples	16x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Micron MT40A1G8WE-083E:B 12GBHynixBench 21%, 222 samples	13x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3E1 1x8GBMicronBench 36%, 2,704 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16