Acer Nitro AN517-52

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Acer Nitro AN517-52 (all builds)
Motherboard	CML Karoq_CMS
Memory	0.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210107
Uptime	4.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '21 at 16:54
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	56%

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10300H 82,821 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	45.1% Average	Memory 28.3 1-Core 113 2-Core 202 58% 114 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 515 52% 423 Pts	64-Core 530 33% 530 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 143F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	4.73% Terrible	Lighting 5 Reflection 35.2 Parallax 6.3 4% 15.5 fps	MRender 5.2 Gravity 6.1 Splatting 9.6 6% 6.97 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.73% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNI-82A0A 256GB 2,723 User benchmarks, average bench 134% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: 11000C00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 149 162 152 147 107 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	68.3% Good	Read 541 Write 618 Mixed 389 SusWrite 144 95% 423 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 39.1 4K Mixed 20 78% 26.6 MB/s	DQ Read 475 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 236 197% 294 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 177%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$113 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 746GB free Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 308 383 313 274 151 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	68.6% Good	Read 344 Write 293 Mixed 294 SusWrite 286 68% 305 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 38.8 4K Mixed 23.3 83% 27.9 MB/s	DQ Read 297 DQ Write 231 DQ Mixed 249 190% 259 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GB 20,126 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.5% Poor	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 10.7 MC Mixed 8.6 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 4.1 14% 5.07 GB/s	Latency 265 15% 265 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 12: 0R 3G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
12%	11%	54	106	40	60	17.3"	1920 1080	BOE084E

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Nitro AN517-52 Builds (Compare 3,388 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN517-52

CPU
Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples	2,152x
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	1,232x
Core i5-10500HIntelBench 80%, 12,921 samples	3x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	1,822x
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	643x
GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 42%, 33,798 samples	358x

SSD
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 169%, 12,303 samples	1,152x
WDC PC SN530 SDB 512GBNvmeBench 156%, 3,698 samples	335x
HFM512GDJTNI-82A0A 512GBBench 154%, 4,415 samples	256x

RAM
HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 2x8GBHynixBench 88%, 37,566 samples	381x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	373x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 2x8GBMicronBench 70%, 20,634 samples	338x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16