Monster TULPAR T7 V16.1

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Monster TULPAR T7 V16.1 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER TULPAR T7 V16.1
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181102
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '21 at 16:02
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Memory 82.4 1-Core 40.4 2-Core 82.7 46% 68.5 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 399 32% 282 Pts	64-Core 562 35% 562 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Clevo(1558 8500) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8904 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.3% Average	Lighting 55.3 Reflection 85.5 Parallax 51.1 45% 64 fps	MRender 65.2 Gravity 61.3 Splatting 63.2 52% 63.2 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$40 8,737 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 194GB free (System drive) Firmware: V6005-a9 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 629 639 601 595 478 468 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	122% Outstanding	Read 575 Write 654 Mixed 553 SusWrite 568 133% 587 MB/s	4K Read 34.5 4K Write 77.2 4K Mixed 44.5 150% 52.1 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 402 DQ Mixed 300 251% 360 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 153%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB 11,708 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 794GB free Firmware: 01.01H01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 91 92 89 71 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	44.7% Average	Read 72.3 Write 52 Mixed 15.1 SusWrite 83.2 40% 55.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFS8266.M8FB 1x8GB 508 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	43.2% Average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 11.1 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 15 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 61: 9R 2G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
61%	17%	122	253	152	120	17.2"	1920 1080	CMN1747

History: Score 49: 6R 3G 10B | Score 61: 9R 2G 10B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T7 V16.1 Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V16.1

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	40x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	20x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	20x

SSD
XPG SX6000 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBAdata $40Bench 119%, 8,737 samples	14x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	7x
SSDSCKKW256G8 256GBIntelBench 90%, 4,898 samples	4x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 40%, 36,753 samples	6x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	3x
CT8G4SFS8266.M8FB 1x8GBCrucialBench 42%, 508 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 31% - Below average

Total price: $40

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16