Asus F2A55-M LK2

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus F2A55-M LK2 (all builds)
Memory	2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130902
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '21 at 15:57
Run Duration	341 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	68%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250 14,744 User benchmarks, average bench 49% FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Memory 80.4 1-Core 50.2 2-Core 119 52% 83.3 Pts	4-Core 140 8-Core 167 20% 153 Pts	64-Core 192 12% 192 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7560D 10,029 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 8526) 768MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.47% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 3.6 Parallax 4.4 2% 3.53 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 4 Splatting 5 3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.47% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ct250mx5 0 250GB 930 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 209 211 208 203 203 MB/s Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	71.2% Very good	Read 236 Write 163 Mixed 228 SusWrite 197 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 62.4 4K Mixed 40.4 136% 45.6 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 153 DQ Mixed 154 118% 160 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 117%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 552GB free Firmware: MS2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 116 142 155 151 155 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Read 163 Write 94.1 Mixed 37.5 SusWrite 125 76% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 120% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.7% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 6.6 18% 6.47 GB/s	SC Read 4.2 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 6.8 14% 5.03 GB/s	Latency 79.7 50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 45: 6R 5G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
45%	14%	80	33	24	75	17"	1280 1024	MAX06D6 Belinea101711

History: Score 3: 0R 0G 3B | Score 35: 4R 3G 6B | Score 38: 4R 3G 9B | Score 37: 3R 4G 10B | Score 45: 6R 5G 0B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F2A55-M LK2 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A55-M LK2

CPU
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	9x
A4-4000 APUAMD $171Bench 39%, 6,528 samples	4x
A6-5400K APUAMD $120Bench 40%, 7,836 samples	4x

GPU
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	4x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	2x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	2x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	3x
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	2x
TS120GSSD220S 120GBTranscendBench 70%, 8,401 samples	2x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	15x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	4x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $288

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16