Asus Z170M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 83% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 70% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	85.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Z170M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160620
Uptime	7.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '21 at 15:24
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	Memory 95.6 1-Core 130 2-Core 250 90% 159 Pts	4-Core 484 8-Core 701 74% 592 Pts	64-Core 692 43% 692 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3703) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 112 Parallax 115 88% 112 fps	MRender 94 Gravity 103 Splatting 102 82% 99.6 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 435GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 361 318 312 329 329 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 450 Write 432 Mixed 315 SusWrite 349 87% 387 MB/s	4K Read 39.8 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 54.3 194% 71.5 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 325 DQ Mixed 332 254% 346 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 123%
HFS128G39MNC-2300A 128GB 541 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 119GB free Firmware: 20200L00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 273 269 272 273 273 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Read 434 Write 270 Mixed 274 SusWrite 271 70% 312 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 27.4 124% 50.8 MB/s	DQ Read 331 DQ Write 246 DQ Mixed 212 179% 263 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS4G4D26BFSC.8FB 2x4GB 1,839 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	87.5% Excellent	MC Read 34 MC Write 33.6 MC Mixed 24.4 88% 30.7 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 33.7 SC Mixed 27.6 78% 27.2 GB/s	Latency 55.4 72% 55.4 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 54: 9R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
54%	58%	24	322	242	60	27"	2560 1440	ACI27EC ROG PG279Q

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,231 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 51%

Yacht

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 44%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus Z170M-PLUS - $87

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	384x
Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	289x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	201x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	121x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	113x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	92x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	58x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	51x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	46x
Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GBHyperX $169Bench 83%, 37,519 samples	34x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $521

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16