Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_D509DA

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_D509DA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509DA
Memory	2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210329
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '21 at 12:43
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U 78,189 User benchmarks, average bench 48% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Memory 64.6 1-Core 85.3 2-Core 157 59% 102 Pts	4-Core 247 8-Core 339 37% 293 Pts	64-Core 355 22% 355 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics 115,953 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 14BF) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.20.02 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	4.88% Terrible	Lighting 5.3 Reflection 5.2 Parallax 7.9 4% 6.13 fps	MRender 6.3 Gravity 6.7 Splatting 8.4 6% 7.13 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 4.88% Great: 13%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GB 4,206 User benchmarks, average bench 145% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20200000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 389 300 305 304 297 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	141% Outstanding	Read 1,143 Write 1,024 Mixed 960 SusWrite 330 193% 864 MB/s	4K Read 38.3 4K Write 95.3 4K Mixed 55.2 179% 62.9 MB/s	DQ Read 537 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 443 328% 438 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 141% Great: 189%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GB 6,259 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	58.6% Above average	MC Read 22.3 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 20.8 59% 20.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 23.4 SC Mixed 20.1 58% 20.4 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 14: 1R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
14%	26%	23	63	6	60	15.5"	1280 720	CMN15E6

History: Score 5: 1R 0G 0B | Score 14: 1R 2G 3B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_D509DA Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_D509DA

CPU
Ryzen 5 3500UAMDBench 48%, 78,189 samples	60x
Ryzen 7 3700UAMDBench 49%, 23,686 samples	38x
Ryzen 3 3200UAMDBench 41%, 21,522 samples	26x

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	60x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	38x
Radeon Vega 3 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 27,821 samples	26x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	48x
MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GBSamsungBench 136%, 14,873 samples	18x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GBWDCBench 145%, 4,206 samples	13x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBSamsungBench 58%, 6,259 samples	35x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBMicronBench 57%, 2,923 samples	18x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16