PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 |
Motherboard | Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 (all builds) |
Memory | 4.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20171109 |
Uptime | 11.1 Days |
Run Date | Sep 26 '21 at 06:09 |
Run Duration | 323 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
90.3%
Outstanding
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Asus(1043 83F6) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.4%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 1TB
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 420 201 124 139 95 MB/s
|
73%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
133GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 70 72 73 73 53 MB/s
|
38.6%
Below average
|
|||
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
73GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 64 66 67 67 47 MB/s
|
41.8%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
73.7%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
49% | 31% | 35 | 317 | 244 | 60 | 24.1" | 1920 1200 | DELA07A DELL U2412M |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples | 1,931x |
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples | 540x |
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 270x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 479x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 304x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 224x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $1,016 |