| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 0.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P5N-EM HDMI (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100615 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 26 '21 at 04:12 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | THA-User |
| Background CPU | 16% |
PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Pentium E6800
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz
|
43.9%
Average
|
43% 63.8 Pts
|
12% 88.4 Pts
|
5% 81.1 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 7100 / nForce 630i
Asus(1043 82AE) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 309.08
|
0.11%
Terrible
|
0% 0.17 fps
| ||
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 115 120 112 119 121 MB/s
|
63.8%
Good
|
62% 86.2 MB/s
|
134% 0.83 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk' Cruzer Fit 16GB
11GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 5.2 8.7 7.1 11 11 MB/s
|
16.7%
Very poor
|
23% 18.6 MB/s
|
203% 2.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 3 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
12.1%
Very poor
|
10% 3.43 GB/s
|
7% 2.47 GB/s
|
42% 94.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5N-EM HDMI Builds (Compare 3 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5N-EM HDMI
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples | 1x |
| Core2 Duo E7400Intel $130Bench 38%, 14,354 samples | 1x |
| Pentium E6800IntelBench 41%, 851 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $110 |