Asus F1A55-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus F1A55-M (all builds)
Memory	2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120209
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '21 at 23:55
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-3400 APU-$80 2,796 User benchmarks, average bench 36% FM1 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Memory 60.7 1-Core 40.6 2-Core 73.2 38% 58.2 Pts	4-Core 77.4 8-Core 79.8 10% 78.6 Pts	64-Core 79.5 5% 79.5 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6410D 3,128 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 84C8) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	1.63% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 1.9 2% 2.1 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 2.5 2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.63% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 344GB free (System drive) Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 108 95 96 104 110 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	Read 31.3 Write 32.1 Mixed 33.3 SusWrite 100 36% 49.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 88%
WD WD1600BEVS-22UST0 160GB 6,043 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 119GB free Firmware: 04.01G04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 46 47 48 48 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	Read 45.9 Write 44.8 Mixed 27.4 SusWrite 46.9 30% 41.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 34%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 64GB 271 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 52GB free, PID 00b2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 30 28 29 30 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Read 30.6 Write 28.7 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 28.4 38% 28.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 2.5 177% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 1x4GB 3,387 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.7% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 5.4 17% 6.1 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 4.9 16% 5.43 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F1A55-M Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A55-M

CPU
A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples	6x
A6-3670 APUAMDBench 46%, 2,400 samples	3x
A6-3650 APUAMDBench 44%, 2,748 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples	3x
Radeon HD 6530DAMDBench 3%, 4,675 samples	2x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	2x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	2x
VERTEX PLUS 120GBOCZBench 31%, 765 samples	2x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	2x

RAM
1333EL Series 2x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 878 samples	2x
KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GBH2X04E99927-15 KHX1600C9D3/4GX SUPERTALENT02 20GBKingstonBench 30%, 3 samples	2x
99U5471-020.A00LF 1x4GBKingstonBench 26%, 3,387 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $146

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16