Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 91% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 94% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	25 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191108
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '21 at 23:28
Run Duration	412 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	85.2% Excellent	Memory 68.3 1-Core 152 2-Core 303 92% 174 Pts	4-Core 546 8-Core 961 91% 754 Pts	64-Core 1,416 88% 1,416 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% EVGA(3842 3067) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Lighting 129 Reflection 115 Parallax 127 105% 124 fps	MRender 185 Gravity 119 Splatting 108 109% 138 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$37 109,999 User benchmarks, average bench 244% 324GB free (System drive) Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1113 657 691 710 683 617 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	251% Outstanding	Read 2,024 Write 2,194 Mixed 1,679 SusWrite 745 373% 1,661 MB/s	4K Read 47.7 4K Write 156 4K Mixed 70.5 245% 91.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,224 DQ Write 950 DQ Mixed 1,056 798% 1,077 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 251% Great: 297%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 3TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 170 171 169 171 167 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	Read 102 Write 109 Mixed 68 SusWrite 168 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.6 230% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 90%
Hitachi HDS5C4040ALE630 4TB 1,274 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 3.5TB free Firmware: MPAOA3B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 110 110 107 108 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	65.3% Good	Read 119 Write 124 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 108 68% 94.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 131% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 73%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 170 171 171 171 172 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	96% Outstanding	Read 165 Write 143 Mixed 70.5 SusWrite 170 100% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 96% Great: 96%
Hitachi HDN728080ALE604 8TB 1,150 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: A4GNW91X SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 157 156 157 156 156 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Read 134 Write 72.1 Mixed 66.8 SusWrite 156 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 0.6 206% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 110%
Hitachi HDN728080ALE604 8TB 1,150 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 139GB free Firmware: A4GNW91X SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 189 199 192 135 122 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 203 Write 200 Mixed 84.9 SusWrite 172 120% 165 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 0.8 240% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 110%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB 3,723 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 141 139 142 143 136 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Read 165 Write 178 Mixed 122 SusWrite 140 204% 151 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 1.6 265% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 95%
TRUSTED Mass Storage 17.5TB 307 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 10TB free, PID 4d10 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 20.6 Mixed 0.2 7% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 20%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB 116 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 3.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 149 149 146 149 151 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Read 150 Write 89.6 Mixed 111 SusWrite 147 165% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 61%
WDC WD40 03FZEX-00Z4SA0 4TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 3TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 149 149 146 149 151 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	62.9% Good	Read 141 Write 158 Mixed 107 SusWrite 147 189% 138 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1.2 158% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 63%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB 154 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 816GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 0 3.5 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	30.6% Below average	Read 151 Write 151 Mixed 122 SusWrite 0.6 135% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 133% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 68%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB 199 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 255GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 0 3.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	24.6% Poor	Read 62.8 Write 80.4 Mixed 114 SusWrite 0.5 89% 64.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.6 193% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB-$560 34,441 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.8% Good	MC Read 27.1 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 26.5 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 20 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 26.4 61% 21.3 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	4	1	60	31.5"	1280 720	SAM0D35 C32F391

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,803 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,642x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,263x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $153Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,410x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,234x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,073x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,467x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,835x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $104Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	865x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	770x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $932

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16