PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z97M Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180307 |
Uptime | 1 Days |
Run Date | Sep 25 '21 at 21:49 |
Run Duration | 217 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 37% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
63.2%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.4%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung MZ7TE512HMHP-000 512GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT06L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 87 82 116 175 177 MB/s
|
34.6%
Below average
|
|||
Hitachi HDS721010KLA330 1TB-$47
405GB free
Firmware: GKAOA9DA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 56 63 54 60 MB/s
|
36.9%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
|
55.5%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
43% | 65% | 23 | 220 | 72 | 75 | 21.5" | 1920 1080 | VSCB731 VX2257 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples | 87x |
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples | 70x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 25x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 37x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 17x |
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 17x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $771 |