Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics98.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory20.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 25 '21 at 20:26
Run Duration316 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 68.1
1-Core 144
2-Core 276
87% 163 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 824
78% 649 Pts
64-Core 1,022
63% 1,022 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$274
Zotac(19DA 2630) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.5% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 116
Parallax 121
104% 122 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 102
Splatting 87.4
87% 109 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1387 1068 1065 1068 1045 1044 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 2,013
Write 2,210
Mixed 1799
SusWrite 1,113
401% 1,784 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 69.5
241% 89.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,186
DQ Write 894
DQ Mixed 1,008
762% 1,029 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 269%
Great: 347%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
155GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 446 445 445 447 448 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 437
Mixed 388
SusWrite 446
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 91.3
4K Mixed 55.5
184% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 198
149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 113%
Great: 134%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 105 106 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 67.4
Write 79.5
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 103
59% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.6
168% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 66%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
726GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 133 133 132 133 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 136
Write 113
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 130
128% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
40% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 53%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
103GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 95 92 95 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 93.1
Write 95.6
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 92.5
114% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
68.4% Good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 27.2
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 26.9
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 39: 3R 6G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
39% 38% 39 341 278 60 27.2" 2560 1440 GSM5B09 LG Ultra HD
History: Score 35: 4R 3G 6B | Score 39: 3R 6G 6B
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,825 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $929
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback